Legal Opinion

Martin v. Setter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 1931No. 28,339PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment rendered in defendants’ favor for $8,845.19, There was a motion for a new trial which presented the questions now raised by the assignments of error. A brief statement of the main facts is necessary.

In August, 1925, defendant A. Milton Setter and plaintiffs entered into a tentative agreement to trade farms, Setter owning 1,600 acres in Canada with equipment of horses and machinery, and plaintiffs owning 360 acres partly in Dakota and partly in Scott counties, this state, with a dairy herd, horses, and machinery. In the deal one Denny was plaintiffs’ agent,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Dwy v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Nashville Interurban Ry. v. GregoryTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. O'Neil v. National Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. O'shea v. New York, C. & St. L. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  5. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Tarnowski v. ResopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. State v. RustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. First Avenue Realty Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API