Legal Opinion
Hickey v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 20, 2003No. Nos. 21 MC 100 (AKH), 02 Civ. 8434 (AKH), 02 Civ. 8092 (AKH), 02 Civ. 8938 (AKH), 02 Civ. 9126 (AKH) to 02 Civ. 9128 (AKH), 03 Civ. 0008 (AKH), 03 Civ. 0034 (AKH), 03 Civ. 0193 (AKH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING AND PARTIALLY DENYING MOTIONS TO REMAND CASES TO STATE COURT
HELLERSTEIN, District Judge.
For almost 100 years, New York State, through numerous provisions of its labor laws, has regulated the workplace to ensure safe conditions for employees. See, e.g., N.Y. Lab. Law §§ 200(1), 241(6) (2003). Pursuant to these statutes, approximately 1200 workers involved in the rescue and clean-up efforts following the collapse of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 have brought suit against the City of New York (“the City”) and the Port Authority of New York and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006