Legal Opinion

Neuser v. Hocker

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided July 22, 1999No. 4:98-cv-00104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRENNEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motions of Auto Owners Insurance Company (herein “the Company”) for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims (docket no. 31) and for summary judgment on the third-party claims of Nancy Hocker and the Hocker-Frick Agency, Inc. (herein collectively “the Agency”) (docket no. 32), and the motion of the Agency for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims (docket no. 37).

Background

Plaintiffs house fell into Lake Michigan. He sought coverage for his losses from the Company based on flood insurance he had purchased…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Houck v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2002
  2. Franken Investments, Inc. v. City of FlintDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API