Goldlawr, Incorporated v. Shubert
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRAFT, District Judge.
After a decade 1 of collateral proceedings, and virtually on the eve of trial, the defendants have moved for summary judgment in these antitrust actions, in which plaintiff charges the defendants with violations of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act 2 for the period 1933-1960 and claims damages allegedly suffered from 1950 to 1960.
For the sole and limited purpose of deciding these motions, the defendants admit that they have engaged in a combination in restraint of trade in the booking and presentation of legitimate theatre attractions throughout the United States…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Moore v. Mead's Fine Bread Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- A. J. Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Tenneco Oil Co. v. TemplinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- In Re Oil Spill By" Amoco Cadiz" Off Coast of FranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Morrison v. WyrschNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Butler v. PoffinbergerDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.