Legal Opinion

Goldlawr, Incorporated v. Shubert

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1967No. Civ. A. 21506, 22092PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KRAFT, District Judge.

After a decade 1 of collateral proceedings, and virtually on the eve of trial, the defendants have moved for summary judgment in these antitrust actions, in which plaintiff charges the defendants with violations of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act 2 for the period 1933-1960 and claims damages allegedly suffered from 1950 to 1960.

For the sole and limited purpose of deciding these motions, the defendants admit that they have engaged in a combination in restraint of trade in the booking and presentation of legitimate theatre attractions throughout the United States…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Moore v. Mead's Fine Bread Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. A. J. Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Tenneco Oil Co. v. TemplinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. In Re Oil Spill By" Amoco Cadiz" Off Coast of FranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  4. Morrison v. WyrschNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Butler v. PoffinbergerDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API