Butler v. Poffinberger
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MAXWELL, Chief Judge.
The above styled case is presently before the Court on consideration of defendant Poffinberger’s motion for leave to assert a counterclaim by amendment, under Rule 13(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff, Vance K. Butler, Jr., resists the motion because the two year West Virginia statute of limitations has expired. W.Va. Code § 55-2-12 (Michie 1966). Plaintiff contends that Rule 15(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, governing the relation back of amendments, does not apply to omitted counterclaims established by amendment.
The general factual…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- T. E. Stoner, Administrator of the Estate of James Kenneth Crowe v. William S. TerranellaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Goldlawr, Incorporated v. ShubertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Keckley v. PaytonDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1958
3Cited by11 opinions
- A. J. Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Estate of Thompson v. Mercedes-Benz, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Index Fund, Inc. v. HagopianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Diematic Manufacturing Corp. v. Packaging Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.