Vanacore v. Expedite Video Conferencing
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
18-3246 Vanacore v. Expedite Video Conferencing UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zalaski v. City of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Rana v. IslamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- General Electric Technical Services Co. v. ClintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Bottini v. Lewis & Judge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Gebhardt v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/NewhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.