Legal Opinion

Vanacore v. Expedite Video Conferencing

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 4, 2020No. 18-3246Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-3246 Vanacore v. Expedite Video Conferencing UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zalaski v. City of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Rana v. IslamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. General Electric Technical Services Co. v. ClintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Bottini v. Lewis & Judge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Gebhardt v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/NewhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API