Legal Opinion
Gebhardt v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on the breach of contract claim seeking commissions based on the sale of advertising time on cable television to the Fuccillo Auto Mall account in 1995. From March 1994 to August 1997 plaintiff was employed by defendant as an at-will employee. Plaintiff worked as a commissioned sales representative, selling advertising time on cable television and servicing advertisers’ accounts. According to plaintiffs affidavit in support of the cross motion and the *979…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Bottini v. Lewis & Judge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Edlitz v. Nipkow & Kobelt, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by11 opinions
- Klein v. Torrey Point Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Kronick v. L.P. Thebault Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- JCS Controls, Inc. v. StaceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- LoGerfo v. Trustees of Columbia UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Gertler v. Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.