Legal Opinion
General Electric Technical Services Co. v. Clinton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1991PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mahoney, P. J.
Until his retirement in 1986, defendant, a United States citizen, was employed as an engineer by plaintiff at various locations outside the United States. In 1981, Congress enacted the Economic Recovery Tax Act pursuant to which certain individuals employed overseas were not required to pay Federal income tax on all or a portion of their compensation (see, 26 USC § 911). Consequently, plaintiff enacted a tax equalization program (hereinafter TEP) effective January 1, 1983 to "insure that its employees working overseas are not subject to greater/lesser…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Waldman v. Englishtown Sportswear, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Gunzburg v. GunzburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- General Electric Technical Services Co. v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by36 opinions
- Arakelian v. Omnicare, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Bottini v. Lewis & Judge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Kronick v. L.P. Thebault Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Conte v. Town of Norfolk Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Henry v. MalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.