Legal Opinion

Miller v. Wadkins

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1966PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The single issue presented on this appeal is whether an insurer which issues an automobile liability insurance policy, containing a no-action clause, in Wisconsin to a Wisconsin resident can be sued directly under sec. 260.11 (1), Stats., when the accident occurs outside the state.

Secs. 204.30 (4) and 260.11 (1), Stats., are commonly known as the “direct-action” statutes. Sec. 204.30 (4) 2 is substantive and creates direct liability between the injured third person and the insurer while sec. 260.11 (1) is procedural and determines when the insurer can be made a party to the action despite the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Wilcox v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Neumann v. Wisconsin Natural Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Frye v. AngstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Ritterbusch v. SexmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Marchlik v. Coronet InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Davis v. FurlongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Cartwright v. SharpeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Forseth v. SweetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. West Side Bank v. Marine National Exchange BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API