Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Estate of Bobbitt

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 8, 1991No. 13128-5-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C.J.

We are asked to decide whether, after the personal representatives have filed a declaration of completion, the superior court may reassert jurisdiction over a nonintervention probate to review the personal representatives' fees and expenses. We hold that the court may do so.

Richard and Kenneth Bobbitt, personal representatives under the nonintervention will of their father, procured an order of solvency in the usual course of the probate proceedings. In due course, they filed a declaration of completion (RCW 11.68.110), which disclosed the attorneys fees paid, 1 that the Bobbitts had each…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Personal Restraint of TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bronson, Jones & Bronson v. PeabodyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. In Re the Estates of AabergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. In Re Coates'estateWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. In Re the Estate of CoffinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Estate of JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re the Estate of ArdellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Harder v. HarderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API