Legal Opinion

Jones v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 3, 2003No. 20651-3-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The superior court has broad authority to oversee the administration of a probated estate, subject only to review for abuse of discretion. But a court does not have this broad discretion when the will confers nonintervention powers on the personal representative. To assert superior court jurisdiction over an estate once its nonintervention status is established, the court must find that the personal representative has mismanaged the estate or otherwise failed to faithfully execute his trust. RCW 11.68.070. Under the probate statutes in effect at the relevant times here, a nonintervention…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re the Marriage of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Department of Transportation v. State Employees' Insurance BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Estate of JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Anderson v. DussaultWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In Re Estate of JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API