Legal Opinion

Bronson, Jones & Bronson v. Peabody

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1932No. 23694. Department OnePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment allowing to respondents twenty-five thousand dollars, with interest from July 1, 1929, as their fees earned as the attorneys for the executors of the estate of Charles E. Peabody, deceased.

The first error assigned questions both the power and the jurisdiction of the trial court to make the allowance. This question must be first disposed of, for if appellants’ position be maintained, we need go no further.

Charles E. Peabody died in August, 1926, leaving a non-intervention will in which Harriet Lilly Macaulay Peabody was named as executrix and Alexander…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. In Re Megrath's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Matson v. Kennecott Mines Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Pedigo v. FullerWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. O'Callaghan v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Estate of JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Jones v. PeabodyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In Re the Estate of ArdellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API