Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Rudnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Charles Rosenthal, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the defendants, entered on the 25th day of April, 1901, upon the decision of the court dismissing the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Hirschberg, J.:

The complaint was dismissed upon the trial upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint alleges in substance that A. Meyers & Sons Company was and is a domestic corporation, and the defendants were and are copartners residing and doing business in the city of New York; that on February 16, 1901, the defendants commenced an *520action against the corporation in the Municipal Court to recover eighty-one dollars and thirty-eight cents, claimed to he due for goods’ sold and delivered; that thereafter and before the return day of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morris v. ByrdDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Rosenthal v. RudnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Rosenthal v. RudnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API