Legal Opinion

Morris v. Byrd

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1957No. 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellant filed a complaint against ap-pellees 1 seeking damages for “breach of release.” Congressional Insurance Company moved for summary judgment, which was granted. This appeal followed.

The facts alleged may be summarized briefly. In December 19S5 a collision occurred between the vehicles of Helen C. Byrd and appellant. Mrs. Byrd filed a claim under her $50.00 deductible automobile collision insurance policy with Congressional, which was paid. Congressional, as subrogee, then brought suit, naming Mrs. Byrd as party plaintiff; the answer alleged that Mrs. Byrd and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boyle Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Bahn Ex Rel. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ShalevDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Bayley v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Goodall v. Frank R. Jelleff, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Proctor v. WardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Insurance Company v. Plaza Drugs, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1971
  2. Motors Insurance Corp. v. Home Indemnity Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Window World of St. Louis, Inc. v. Window World, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API