Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Rudnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from municipal court, borough of Brooklyn. Action by Charles Rosenthal against Jacob Rudnick and another. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHirschberg, J.

On the first appeal in this case we held that the facts stated in the complaint constituted a good cause of action. See Rosenthal v. Rudnick, 65 App. Div. 519, 72 N. Y. Supp. 804. The cause of action stated in the complaint was one for damages resulting from the settlement of an action after suit brought, with an agreement on the part of the plaintiffs in such action to procure a discontinuance of the suit, but which agreement was not carried out, judgment was entered in the action against the defendant therein, a corporation, and the debtor was consequently subjected to the payment of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. RudnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Rosenthal v. RudnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenthal v. RudnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API