Legal Opinion

State v. Fast

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 28, 1998No. 16154-4-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Jeremy Paul Fast was convicted as an accomplice in a series of convenience store robberies. He was sentenced to concurrent sentences for the substantive crimes, three of which carried firearm enhancements. The enhancements were made consecutive, both to the substantive sentences and to each other. Without the enhancements, the concurrent substantive sentences would have resulted in a 57-month sentence. The consecutive enhancements increased that sentence to 213 months. The question presented is whether the sentencing court had discretion to make the enhancements concurrent instead of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. ContrerasWashington Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API