Legal Opinion

United States v. Matthew Varner

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2007No. 06-2862PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Circuit Judge.

Matthew Allen Varner conditionally pled guilty to possession of ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2), reserving the right to appeal the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to suppress. Varner appeals, asserting the seizure of ammunition during a warrantless search violates the Fourth Amendment. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

I

Two Cedar Rapids police officers approached Varner’s home with an arrest warrant for failure to pay child support. At the door, Varner identified himself, and stepped outside. He was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. PPS, Inc. v. Faulkner County, Ark.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. CastellanosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. BynumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API