Legal Opinion
Skolnick & Sons v. Heyman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 22, 1986No. 3787PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his application to confirm what he claimed to be two arbitration awards. The plaintiff is a contractor which constructed two shopping centers for the defendant. The dispositive issue is whether the identical provision in the two construction contracts between the parties requiring the submission of certain disputes over payment for determination by the projects’ architect is an agreement for arbitration, and whether, therefore, the architect’s determinations are subject to confirmation pursuant to General Statutes § 52-417.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maross Construction, Inc. v. Central New York Regional Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Gary Excavating, Inc. v. Town of North HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Lavigne v. LavigneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Covenant Insurance v. BanksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- L. F. Pace & Sons, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Crowther v. Gerber Garment Technology, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Fortier v. Newington Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Ronald E. Fayer v. Town of Middlebury, Edward St. John, First Selectman, and Eric Ianantuoni, Administrative AssistantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Jacob v. Seaboard, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.