B. Leibensperger v. Carpenter Technologies, Inc. t/a Carpenter Technology Corp.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
JUDGE COHN JUBELIRER
I agree with the Majority’s conclusion that Bruce Leibensperger (Appellant) met his prima facie case of sex discrimination by producing evidence showing the disparate treatment of his co-worker Jackie Berk by Carpenter Technologies, Inc. (Employer). However, because I believe that the evidence presented, if admissible at trial, is not sufficient for Appellant to meet his burden of proving that Employer’s proffered justification for its action was pretext for illegal discrimination, I, respectfully, dissent.
*1080Central to my disagreement with the Majority…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Sandra L. SIMPSON Appellant, v. KAY JEWELERS, DIVISION OF STERLING, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Frederick F. KELLER, Appellant, v. ORIX CREDIT ALLIANCE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.