Legal Opinion

McCurdy v. Standard Realty Corporation

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 29, 1943PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

The case involves an .implied restrictive agreement concerning the nse of real property, or, as it has been called a reciprocal negative easement. It is a covenant which equity raises and fastens upon the title of a lot or lots carved out of a tract that will prevent their use in a manner detrimental to the enjoyment and value of neighboring lots sold with express restrictions in their conveyance. The question is brought to us by an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to and dismissing an intervening petition. The primary case was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Rowan's Ex'rs v. Town of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  4. Sprague v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. McBride v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Land Developers, Inc. v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Arthur v. Lake Tansi Village, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bellemeade Company v. PriddleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
  4. Saccomanno v. FarbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. SKYLINE WOODS HOMEOWNERS v. BroekemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API