Legal Opinion
Bellemeade Company v. Priddle
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided February 1, 1974PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINFELD, Justice.
Appellee Dr. Harold D. Priddle and his neighbors are owners of residential lots in Sections I, II, III or IV of Bellemeade, approved and recorded sections of a subdivision. On an appeal and a petition for a declaration of rights they obtained a circuit court judgment setting aside certain acts of the Paducah Planning and Zoning Commission and enjoining it from “ * * * further proceedings in connection with the pending ápplication by * * * ” appellant, The Bellemeade Company, its owners and developers (hereinafter developers) “ * * * for approval of the proposed neighborhood…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- American Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- City of Louisville v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Evans v. PollockTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Mohilef v. JanoviciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- City of Miami v. Save Brickell Ave., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Treme v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Danville-Boyle County Planning & Zoning Commission v. PrallKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.