Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alvarado v. Estate of Kidd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 29, 2016No. 1140706 and 1140752Published

1DissentBryan, Justice

I respectfully dissent. I find Wood v. Wayman, 47 So.3d 1212 (Ala.2010), to be problematic, and I would consider overruling it. However, that request is not before us. Regardless, I do not believe Wood precludes the application of the relation-back doctrine in this case. It appears that Wood, as the main opinion notes, indicates that the appointment of a personal representative after the limitations period has expired may relate back to the filing of the petition within the limitations period if the delay in the appointment is the result of the probate court’s “inadvertence” or “dereliction.”…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wood v. WaymanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. Ogle v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Flannigan v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Affinity Hospital, L.L.C. v. WillifordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Allen v. Estate of JuddineSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API