Legal Opinion

Dye v. Miller & Viele

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1978No. 15475PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Defendant (“Miller & Viele”) appeals from that portion of a summary judgment quieting title in plaintiff (“Dye”) to an undivided one-half interest in all of the minerals 1 in the NW ¼ NW ¼, Section 29, T1S, R1W, U.S.B.M., situated in Duchesne County, Utah.

Dye and Miller & Viele each moved for summary judgment on undisputed facts abstracted as follows: The 40-acre parcel in question was the subject of a 1927 preliminary tax sale to Duchesne County to pay delinquent real property taxes thereon for the year 1926. Dye claims title by virtue of a subsequent tax deed issued pursuant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Company v. Heber A. Peterson and Astrid N. D. Peterson, Phillips Petroleum Company v. John H. Haslem and Rebecca H. HaslemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  2. Churchill v. . OnderdonkNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Dixon v. American Liberty Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. Peterson v. CallisterUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Hansen v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frederiksen v. LaFleurUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Dillman v. FosterUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Dillman v. FosterUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Dye v. Miller & VieleUtah Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API