Dye v. Miller & Viele
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Justice:
Defendant (“Miller & Viele”) appeals from that portion of a summary judgment quieting title in plaintiff (“Dye”) to an undivided one-half interest in all of the minerals 1 in the NW ¼ NW ¼, Section 29, T1S, R1W, U.S.B.M., situated in Duchesne County, Utah.
Dye and Miller & Viele each moved for summary judgment on undisputed facts abstracted as follows: The 40-acre parcel in question was the subject of a 1927 preliminary tax sale to Duchesne County to pay delinquent real property taxes thereon for the year 1926. Dye claims title by virtue of a subsequent tax deed issued pursuant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Company v. Heber A. Peterson and Astrid N. D. Peterson, Phillips Petroleum Company v. John H. Haslem and Rebecca H. HaslemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Churchill v. . OnderdonkNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Dixon v. American Liberty Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Peterson v. CallisterUtah Supreme Court · 1957
- Hansen v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frederiksen v. LaFleurUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Dillman v. FosterUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Dillman v. FosterUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Dye v. Miller & VieleUtah Supreme Court · 1978