Legal Opinion

Gabbidon v. King

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 5, 1993PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The Gabbidons commenced this action against their lessor (King) and her alleged agent claiming that their *686daughter Anna, who was under the age of six, had been harmed by lead in the leased premises. King filed a third-party complaint against the third-party defendant director seeking a declaration that lead poisoning regulations that the director had issued were unlawful. On motion of the director, a Superior Court judge, without a statement of reasons, dismissed the third-party complaint and entered a separate judgment of dismissal of the third-party complaint. We allowed King’s application…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WesterlindMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Stewart v. American International Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. St. Germaine v. PendergastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. U. S. General, Inc. v. City of JolietCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LevesqueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Demeo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  3. Feeney v. Dell Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Fay v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Buffalo-Water 1, LLC v. Fidelity Real Estate Company, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API