Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 10, 1992PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiff (Aetna) and the defendant (Continental) disagree over their respective obligations to pay for the costs of defense of an action brought against the Mohawk Trail Regional School District Committee (Mohawk), which both Aetna and Continental insured at the relevant times. The motion judge decided that the costs of defense should be shared equally. We conclude that judgment should be entered placing the entire cost of defense on Aetna.

Mohawk discharged an employee in April, 1983, based on accusations that she had stolen money from the school. The employee sued the school committee…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bratt v. International Business MacHines Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Hartford Insurance v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Transamerica Insurance Group v. Turner Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Hershenow v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. GTE Products Corp. v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Boston Herald, Inc. v. SharpeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. LevesqueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Feeney v. Dell Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API