Legal Opinion
Paul v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-1671PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant District of Columbia’s motion to dismiss. Also before the Court are plaintiff William D. Paul’s motion to restore entry and his motion for default, as well as the District’s motion to strike Mr. Paul’s surreply. Upon careful consideration of the parties’ papers, the relevant legal authorities, and the entire record in this case, the Court will grant the District’s motion to dismiss. The Court will also grant Mr. Paul’s motion to restore entry, deny Mr. Paul’s motion for default, and deny as moot…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wells v. HenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Paul v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012