Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2004No. Docket 248315PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, J.

In this action to recover benefits under the Michigan no-fault act, MCL 500.3101 el seq., defen*97dant Auto Club Insurance Association appeals as of right from the trial court order granting summary-disposition in favor of plaintiffs Diane and James Cameron, guardians of Daniel Cameron. The question presented is whether the saving provision of the Revised Judicature Act (RJA), MCL 600.5851(1), applies to toll the “one-year back” rule of the no-fault act, MCL 500.3145(1). We conclude that the saving provision, by its terms, applies only to actions filed under the RJA and that it does not,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Eggleston v. Bio-Medical Applications of Detroit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Walen v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Boyle v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cooper v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hatcher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Klida v. BramanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Craig v. Detroit Public Schools Chief Executive OfficerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API