Legal Opinion
Sure-Fit Products Co. v. Fry Products, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 6, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
These are motions (1) by the defendants Fry Products, Inc., Walter L. Fry and Charles J. Jackson to quash the service of process; (2) by the defendant Fred Katzner for similar relief; and (3) by the defendants Comfy Manufacturing Co., Louis I. Katzner and Arthur Oppenheimer, Jr., for a dismissal of the complaint.
The plaintiffs are copartners doing business in Philadelphia, and having a branch office in New York City. Each is a resident and citizen of Pennsylvania.
The defendant Fry Products, Inc., is a Michigan corporation with its principal office in Michigan. It has no…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Fleitmann Ex Rel. Stockholders of the Consolidated Street Lighting Co. v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Geneva Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. S. Karpen & Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goldlawr, Incorporated v. ShubertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Davenport v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Wilensky v. Standard Beryllium CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1964
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. WimerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co. (Delaware)District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.