Legal Opinion

Popoola v. MD-INDIVIDUAL PRACTICE ASS'N, INC.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 4, 2003No. CIV.A. DKC 2000-2946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHASANOW, District Judge.

Presently pending and ready for resolution is Plaintiffs renewed motion to- remand. 1 The issues are fully briefed, and the court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6, no hearing being deemed necessary. For the following reasons, the motion will be granted.

I. Background

Plaintiff Shade Popoola initially filed this action in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, alleging state law causes of action against three defendants. 2 The controversy concerns subrogation rights of a health maintenance organization when a member or insured obtains recovery…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
Frances Darcangelo v. Verizon Communications, Incorporated Core, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
Custer v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Florence v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
Levine v. United Healthcare Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003