Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Medtronic, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 10, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00403Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JOY REYNOLDS, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:20-cv-403 : v. : Judge Thomas M. Rose : MEDTRONIC, INC., et al., : : Defendants. : ______________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 13) ______________________________________________________________________________ This is a products liability case brought by Plaintiff Joy Reynolds (“Reynolds”).1 In her…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API