Legal Opinion

In Re Moore's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1940No. Docket No. 37, Calendar No. 40,667PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

Plaintiffs, Charles F. Erb and Minnie A. Erb, of Pontiac, Michigan, presented a claim for damages against the estate of Andrew L. Moore. In substance, they allege that they retained Mr. Moore, an attorney of Pontiac, to represent them as' co-counsel in a pending mortgage moratorium suit; that the plaintiffs, who were mortgagors of an apartment building in Pontiac on which the mortgage had been foreclosed, made a settlement with the New York Life Insurance Company, mortgagee, whereby the latter was to receive a surrender of the equity of redemption and a bill of sale of furnishings used on the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shepard v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. McHugh v. Estate of DowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Lee State Bank v. McElhenyMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Geisel v. BurgMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Hutton v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farabaugh v. RhodeMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Etherington v. BailiffMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API