Legal Opinion

Farabaugh v. Rhode

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1943No. Docket No. 55, Calendar No. 42,196PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Gallitzen A. Farabaugh brought suit to quiet title to five small parcels of property all situated in the north fractional half of section 13, township 6 south, range 20 west in Lake township, Berrien county, Michigan. Instead of describing the parcels by metes and bounds, we have marked them for purposes of clarity and brevity “A,” “B,” “C,” “D” and “E” on the plat which was introduced as Exhibit 1 by plaintiff and a rough copy of which is attached to this opinion. There were a large number of defendants in the- case all of whom, with the exception of the three appellants, Dorothy Coleman…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Negaunee Iron Co. v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Willey v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Bauman v. BarendregtMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. McConnell v. RathbunMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Johnson Family Ltd. Partnership v. White Pine Wireless, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Blackhawk Development Corp. v. Village of DexterMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Taylor v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Boekeloo v. KuschinskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Minerva Partners, Ltd v. First Passage, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API