Legal Opinion
Connecticut Savings Bank v. City of New Haven
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 21, 1945PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The preliminary statement above sufficiently describes the general situation. Both cases were tried together before a state referee. Both appeals are based on the overruling of remonstrances to the reports. The plaintiff claims that all of the valuations placed on the properties are too high The defendant claims that no reductions should have been granted. Ninety-seven different assessments are involved but neither side has requested detailed analysis of each individual assessment except in so far as is necessary to test the validity of the conclusions reached by the referee, with which the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Somers v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Cohn v. City & Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Appeal of Cohen From Board of Street CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hutensky v. Town of AvonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Sibley v. Town of MiddlefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Newbury Commons Ltd. Partnership v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Burritt Mutual Savings Bank v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Thaw v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.