Seeley v. Sisters of Providence
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
The Workers’ Compensation Board held that a doctor’s opinion that it was more likely than not that claimant contracted hepatitis C at work was not sufficient to meet claimant’s burden of production. Claimant seeks review of that order. We reverse and remand.
Claimant has worked as an operating room technician for more than 25 years. She has worked for her current employer, St. Vincent’s Hospital, since 1984. Over the course of her career, claimant has repeatedly handled needles, scalpels, scissors, hypodermic needles, and other sharp instruments. In the course of her work, claimant has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McTaggart v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Bronco Cleaners v. VelazquezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Martin v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sisters of Providence v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- E. DUARTE v. SAIF CorporationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Getz v. Wonder BurCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Rogers v. CorVel Enterprise Comp, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- White-Munro v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002