Legal Opinion

Getz v. Wonder Bur

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 28, 2002No. 97-00652; A114152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

If a worker sustains a compensable injury and subsequently, as part of the claim closure and evaluation process, his physician orders an examination to determine the worker’s residual capacity, and, during that exam, the worker sustains a second injury, is the second injury itself compensable? In this case, the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) held that it was not, and claimant seeks judicial review. Because the material facts are not in dispute, we review only for errors of law. ORS 656.298(7); ORS 183.482(8). We reverse.

Claimant worked for employer as a bartender. In 1993, he compensably…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Larsen v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Andrews v. Tektronix, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McAleny v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API