Legal Opinion

Bronco Cleaners v. Velazquez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 1996No. 94-05931; CA A89443PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Employer 1 seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant’s claim is compensable. We review the Board’s findings for substantial evidence and its legal conclusions for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8)(a), (c), and affirm.

Claimant began working for employer, a dry cleaning business, in June 1992. While at work, she was exposed to chemicals and steam. In September 1993, she began noticing a rash on her face that gradually worsened. She sought treatment with Dr. Meckland, who diagnosed the condition as contact dermatitis and prescribed treatment with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Volk v. Birdseye DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Edwards v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Allie v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McTaggart v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Seeley v. Sisters of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Martin v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. McTaggart v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. SAIF Corp. v. DanboiseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API