Legal Opinion

Trabing v. California Navigation & Improvement Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1898No. Sac. No. 295PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. Ansel Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

The plaintiff is a minor, and was of the age of fourteen years at the time of the injuries complained of. The defendant is a corporation engaged in operating a line of steamboats between San Francisco and the city of Stockton for the transportation of passengers and freight to and from those places and intermediate ports. The additional facts constituting plaintiff’s cause of action, as alleged in the complaint, may be summarized as follows:

On the evening of March 23, 1895, at about 8 o’clock, the plaintiff boarded defendant’s steamer, “Mary Garratt,” at Benicia, to be carried to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Stephenson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Lothrop v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  5. Gorman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Scally v. W. T. Garratt & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Stuck v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Pacific Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Bank of Palo AltoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  5. Tellefsen v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API