Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1892No. 14620PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, and from an order denying a new .trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages, resulting from his wrongful expulsion from a railroad train owned and operated by the defendant.

It is alleged in the complaint that on the twenty-first day of May, 1890, plaintiff was desirous of being conveyed from Antioch, in Contra Costa County, to Bethany, in San Joaquin County, upon defendant’s railroad train) and that he paid to defendant’s agent at Antioch the usual fare for that purpose, and received in return a ticket entitling him to such conveyance on the regular passenger train running between the two places named;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. . Third Avenue Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Head v. Georgia Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Russell v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Quigley v. Central Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Frewen v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Basler v. Sacramento Elec., Gas & Ry.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Foster v. KeatingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Warner v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API