Brisbin v. Farmer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal from an order of tbe district court for Ramsey county, denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Ripley, Ch. J.
This action was commenced on Dec. 27, 1869, on a judgment recovered by Brisbin and one Guerin against Parmer in tbe district court for Ramsey county, Dec. 23, 1857, for $844.23, and in which said Guerin in Nov., 1869 assigned his interest to the plaintiff.
*217Defendant pleaded the statute of limitations; and accord and satisfaction, substantially as follows: The complaint alleges that said judgment had been in no part paid or satisfied, except that in June, 1865, the defendant paid the sum of $275 on said judgment. This allegation was denied, and the answer avers, that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burwell v. TullisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
- Whitaker v. RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
- Anderson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1852
- Smith v. MullikenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
- Conway v. WhartonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Chadwick v. CornishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Cashmar-King Supply Co. v. Dowd & KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State Ex Rel. Maffett v. TurnbullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Lester v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.