Smith v. Mulliken
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This was an appeal from a judgment of tbe District Court of Winona County. The following is the substance of the complaint in the action: The Plaintiff says that he, on the fifteenth day of November, 1850, in the Supreme Court, in and for the County of Steuben and State of New York, recovered a final judgment by due course of law, against the Defendant for the sum of $250, with $37,86 costs, amounting in all to $287,86. That the said judgment still remains in full forcé and…
Read the full summary
This was an appeal from a judgment of tbe District Court of Winona County. The following is the substance of the complaint in the action: The Plaintiff says that he, on the fifteenth day of November, 1850, in the Supreme Court, in and for the County of Steuben and State of New York, recovered a final judgment by due course of law, against the Defendant for the sum of $250, with $37,86 costs, amounting in all to $287,86. That the said judgment still remains in full forcé and effect, not reversed, satisfied or in any wise vacated, and that he has not received or obtained any satisfaction of or…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Flandbau J.
This action is on a judgment alleged to have been recovered “ in the Supreme Court in and for the County of Steuben and State of New Yorkno allegations of the character of the Court are given, whether it is of general or special jurisdiction, or whether it had jurisdiction of the Defendant or the subject of the action. The complaint is verified by the attorney for the Plaintiff, under the Act of March 1st 1856, Session Laws, 1856, p. 6 and7, by swearing simply that he believes the complaint to be true, and has in his *321possession an authenticated copy of the record and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Miller v. MaxwellNew York Supreme Court · 1836
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brisbin v. FarmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Bonnifield v. ThorpDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1896
- Hayward v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Doe v. Legacy Broadcasting of Minnesota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Stroud v. Hennepin County Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.