Conway v. Wharton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The defendant in this case appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of the County of Ramsey, striking out one of the defenses, set up in his answer. A sufficient statement of the case appears in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
By the Court The complaint in this case sets up five causes of action, and the answer seven separate defenses. The sixth defense is a plea of the statute of limitations to all the causes of action alleged in the complaint. The seventh defense avers that in March, 186J, the plaintiff and defendant had “ a full and complete accounting together * * * of all business between them, of every kind, and that upon such accounting it was found and expressly agreed by and between them that said defendant should make and deliver to said plaintiff a certain wagon, in full settlement and satisfaction of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winchell v. . HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- The People v. . McCumberNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Derby v. GallupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Whitney v. Reese & HeylinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- Schuyler v. YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1834
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brisbin v. FarmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Barker v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Gross v. St. Paul F. & M. Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1884
- Cook v. FinchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Roblee v. SecrestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881