Legal Opinion

Noseda v. Delmul

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1931No. 22442PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The legal question in this case is as to the effect of the special verdict of the jury rendered at the trial in the court of common pleas. This special verdict reads as follows:

“We, nine or more of the jury in the above entitled cause, do find as follows: On September 27th, 1925, plaintiff was riding in defendant’s automobile, being then and there driven by Angelo Delmul, plaintiff’s brother, at defendant’s request — to which plaintiff did not object. They were returning from a place in Ashtabula county, coming west on Euclid avenue, toward Cleveland in the roadway reserved exclusively for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Graham v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. BushIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Conner v. Citizens Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Glantz v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Masters v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Smith v. Pennsylvania RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Mobberly v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Creighton v. KiehlOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. NiemiecOhio Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API