Legal Opinion

Creighton v. Kiehl

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.

This appeal is the aftermath of a successful will contest which set aside the testament of one Edward Pearson. Its proponents complain of certain court rulings and instructions, and that the verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence. By reason thereof a reversal of the judgment is sought. We shall consider these claimed errors in such sequence as seems advisable.

The attack was waged upon two grounds, mental incapacity and undue influence. Upon the request of the contestant a special interrogatory was propounded which required the jury to find whether the testator at the time of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maumee Valley Railways & Light Co. v. HanawayOhio Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Smith v. Cushman Motor Delivery Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Noseda v. DelmulOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plaster v. Akron Union Passenger Depot Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Leach, Admx. v. NannaOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Simpson v. SpringerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Levine v. Gallup Sand & Gravel Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API