Legal Opinion
Bowlen v. ATR Coil Co., Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 17, 1990No. 53A01-8911-CV-466PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Winnie Lois Bowlen, Teresa Dawn Hig-nite, Donna Lee Hobbs, and Deloris Ann King (collectively, the workers), appeal the dismissal of their complaint alleging wrongful discharge and the intentional infliction of emotional distress by the ATR Coil Company and David A. Wiley, general manager and secretary of ATR Coil Company (collectively, ATR). The trial court determined that Indiana law could not provide the workers with a remedy because ATR had a federally protected right under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 1 to discharge supervisory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Beasley v. Food Fair of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Thiele v. Ind. Dept. of HighwaysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Sheridan v. Town of MerrillvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gorman v. NORTHEASTERN REMCIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Humphries v. PAY AND SAVE, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Humphries v. PAY AND SAVE, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011