Legal Opinion
Humphries v. PAY AND SAVE, INC.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 11, 2011No. 29,197PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff William R. Humphries argues the district court improperly dismissed his claims. He alleged below that his employers Pay and Save, Inc., and Tim Cotton (collectively Defendants) improperly terminated his employment on suspicion that he engaged in union-organizing activities. The district court concluded that federal labor law preempted Plaintiff’s claims. We agree and affirm.
BACKGROUND
{2} On May 13, 2008, Plaintiff filed a complaint in the district court seeking relief on six counts: (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Firstenberg v. MonribotNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Firstenberg v. MonribotNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Humphries v. PAY AND SAVE, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Schmidt v. Tavenner’s Towing & RecoveryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019