Legal Opinion

In re Cayne Const. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 6, 1932No. Nos. 21626, 21627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

These two eases under stipulation were tried together.

The petitions were filed on January 8, 1932, and the answers raise the issue of insolvency and deny the commission of any act of bankruptcy, and also deny that the petitioning creditors, Honahan Company,' Inc., B. Smolka Plumbing Supply Company, and Gordon Plumbing & Heating Supply Company, Inc., had provable claims. Thereafter additional creditors, Cross, Austin & Ireland Lumber Company and Kenlon Coal Company, were, by order of the court, joined as petitioning creditors, the former in both eases, and the latter in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. West Co. v. LeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Greenville Banking & Trust Co. v. SelcowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  3. In Re MacKlemDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
  4. Bogen & Trummel v. ProtterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Central Illinois Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. Ansley Park Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Mikart, Inc. (In Re Mikart, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
  3. Flori Pipe Co. v. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. In re Eastern Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API