Legal Opinion

Archer v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1982No. 13360PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellants, the Archers, brought this action to rescind and terminate certain lease agreements which they had entered into with defendant-respondent Mountain Fuel Supply Company, and to rescind and terminate a sublease agreement between Mountain Fuel and defendant-respondent Beker Industries Corp. The Archers also sought damages for nonpayment of royalties. The leases involved are phosphate leases which the Archers originally obtained from the Department of the Interior. The Archers’ complaint sought relief based upon the failure of Mountain Fuel and Beker to mine…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Beal v. Mars Larsen Ranch Corp., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Eastern Kentucky Mineral & Timber Co. v. Swann-Day Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Revello v. RevelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. World Wide Lease, Inc. v. WoodworthIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Eliopulos v. Kondo Farms, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Bastian v. Albertson's, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Bengoechea v. BengoecheaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API