Legal Opinion

Daniel v. . Bethell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Devin, J., at June Term, 1914, of Roce-INGHAM.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, 0. J.

This is an action for the recovery of $305.91 alleged to be due for services rendered as clerk to the firm of W. P. Bethell & Co. The summons was issued against “W. P. Bethell and Mary Sue Bethell, partners, trading under the firm name of W. P. Bethell & Co.” The complaint alleged that they were partners doing business in that style, and that the services were rendered by the plaintiff under a contract with them, on which there was a balance due of $305.91. The answer denied the partnership. The summons was served on "W. P. Bethell alone. The answer alleged that Mary Sue Bethell…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. . SanderlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Hanstein v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones Knitting Corp. v. A. M. Pullen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  2. Dwiggins v. Parkway Bus Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Johnston County v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Stout v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API