Davis v. . Sanderlin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oiviu agtioN, heard on case agreed before Boykin, J., at Special Term, 1896, of Bertie Superior Court, on appeal from a judgment of -Justice of the Peace. There was judgment for the plaintiffs and defendant Mebane appealed. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of Associate .Justice Montgomery.
1Opinion of the Court
MoNtgomery, J.:
The parties to this action agreed upon the facts, and submitted the same to the court below, that judgment might be entered according to the opinion of his Honor. It appears from the facts agreed on that the articles of limited partnership between the defendant Mebane and his former partners were, drawn according to the requirements of the law, and that they were registered in the proper county. But it does not appcr that they were published in a newspaper as required by the statute. Section 3096 of The Code provides that “ the terms of the partnership (limited) must be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rufty v. . Claywell, Powell Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rathke v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- North State Finance Co. v. LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Upper Appomattox Co. v. BuffaloeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Carson v. . WoodrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Durham Fertilizer Co. v. MarshburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.