Legal Opinion

Hanstein v. . Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. That on or about the ....... day of ............., 1873, and since that time, the defendants above named became members of the Clinton Loan Association under articles of agreement, which said association at the time hereinafter mentioned was unincorporated and did a general banking business in the town of Clinton.

2. That in February, 1891, and prior thereto, and now, the persons named in the second defense of the answer of A. F. Johnson and others were also members and shareholders of said association.

3. That at the times mentioned in the complaint the plaintiff, M. Hanstein, deposited…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dunn v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones Knitting Corp. v. A. M. Pullen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  2. North State Finance Co. v. LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Taylor v. . EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Daniel v. . BethellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Davis v. Bessemer City Cotton MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API